- Home
- Candidates
- Press
- Donate
- Subscribe
- Defend Fair Elections
- Our Reforms
- Archived Reports
- U.S. President
- US Senate, CO
- U.S. Senate Forum, Nov'19
- CO House Districts 2020
- Colorado Senate Distr 31
- Colorado Senate Distr 33
- 2019 Denver City Offices
- 2019 DPS
- Aurora '19 Municipal
- 2E Simulation (2019)
- 2019 Den Council District
- 2018 Colorado Statewide
- 2018 CO Congressional
- 2018 Colorado State House
- 2018 Colorado Senate
- *All Denver Candidates
- 2018 Candidate Forums
- 2018 Candidate Forums
- Denver Fair Elections Act
Diana Bray
"Sometimes we get questions about foreign policy, but in this case, I think that big money has affected our democracy by destroying our democracy from within. And our greatest threat is not another country. Our greatest threat is not Russia or Iran or China. Our greatest threat is what we are doing to ourselves. And that is...connected to the fact that elections are bought, that we don’t have campaign finance reform, and that we might be in a place right now where we can’t trust our justices and judges. Citizens United was an egregious, egregious law that has put the power in the hands of people who do not have the best interest of the most vulnerable amongst us in mind. We have to move toward a system of equity."
Michelle Warren
"Thank you for asking this question overtly. I’ve been searching things about money in our legislative process throughout this morning. I can’t say enough about, yes, absolutely, in every way it is impacting our legislative systems, from buying our elections as well as keeping certain legislators in place. I’m in full support of the For The People Act [H.R.1]. The For The People Act is a response to what happened with Citizens United. I support publicly funded elections. I want to see more transparency and an end to dark money in our campaign. But it does not just stop with campaign finance reform. The reality is that people are always looking for loopholes. Also, when you look at the lobbying industry, we have 535 seats that make up the House and the Senate; we have 21 lobbyists to every one Congressional leader. I guarantee that the money problem does not just sit at campaign finance, but is throughout the whole system."
Trish Zornio
"I’ve been very lucky throughout this race to get not only local press but also national press. However, one of the things that was very interesting to me was that when I launched this campaign it did not preclude the fact that sometimes I got emails back saying we will not cover the fact that you launched because we haven’t had a chance yet to see your bank account. That is the sort of thing that is happening right now. And we need to also talk about the women’s issue. In over 142 years we have never elected a woman to the United States Senate from Colorado. 142 years. And when we talk about who the donor base for the Democratic Party largely is, it’s a certain demographic. And it’s not women. And it’s especially not younger voters. And so when we have to look at how special interests prevents people like me from being taken seriously at this table. To that end, we are a grassroots-funded campaign, we do have BREs in the back, and if you would like to donate 5, 25, whatever you can, we have volunteers -- can you raise your hand? -- running around. So please, help us out and remedy this injustice."
John Hickenlooper
"So the question how specifically has money in politics affected policy. Oh my God! Where do you start? Health care. Why is that we’re paying more for our prescription drugs than any other country on earth? Why is we have so little transparency? Where if you go out of your health care system and get an emergency appendicitis operation you have no idea what it’s going to cost or what your co-pay is going to be. Look at guns, for goodness sakes! The NRA continues to restrain universal background checks through their – let’s call it their persistence – at a time when 80% of Americans believe in background checks and over 91% of people in Colorado. Corey Gardner and Mitch McConnell aren’t sure really it would be useful. That’s not their opinion of the dollars they spent. Climate Change. I’m already out of time, Climate Change, if we’re going to solve this, I should have answered this last question, there’s – we’re going to create jobs for everyone, but those jobs have to be evenly distributed."
Lorena Garcia
"Yeah, I think we know how much money plays into politics. And the reality is that all of these amazing ideas that have been put out, whether it’s addressing the climate crisis, health care, fixing our education system, fixing our broken immigration system – none of this is going to happen if we don’t have comprehensive campaign finance reform. As long as big money can buy votes, we’re not going to win. As long as big money can determine who’s appointed to run our agencies, we’re not going to win. We have to do that, and that should be our No. 1 priority when we get to the U.S. Senate. When we talk about all of us on stage, I’m proud to say that I’m the only candidate on this stage that receives more dollars from their campaign at less than $200 per donation, more than 50%. At 53% I’m proud of that, and it continues to grow. We need to make sure that when we are looking at who we are going to support, where are they getting their support from? Are they going to [be] beholding to just a few top donors, or are they going to [be] beholden to us the electorate."
Andrew Romanoff
"I’ll answer that question too. 84% of our donations come from Colorado, 100% come from humans, because we’re not taking corporate money. I’m proud to be running a grassroots campaign. Look, Mark Twain once said, everybody complains about the weather, but nobody does anything about it. So I think we ought to solve this problem by enacting, as Lorena said, comprehensive campaign finance reform, and I think we ought to expose the pay-to-play politics in our own party that continues to sell Senate seats to the highest bidder. We ought to reverse the Supreme Court’s decisions, both in Citizens United that transformed corporations into people, and in an earlier decision called Buckley vs. Vallejo that transformed money into speech. Unless we do those things, we will continue to dramatically narrow the pool of candidates who run and the pool who win and warp the decisions they make as a result. I never want to have to worry about doing what’s right for my constituents or what might be profitable for my corporate contributors. I avoid that dilemma because I don’t have any corporate contributors."
Stephanie Rose Spaulding
"Y’all asked the question, how has money impacted policy? It has allowed here in the state of Colorado an initiative that would have given us climate policy and legislation, that would have given us answers to our crisis, it allowed for individuals to sue communities, it allowed for individuals right here on this stage to bail out on immigrants when they were in position and had the opportunity to go against what was happening. It allowed for a number individuals even right now to have a leg up in what we are experiencing right now in this Senate race. African American women are the least funded candidates across the country for every seat. That is how money impacts policy. You don’t get the kind of candidates to speak from a different perspective and create an inclusive policy because we don’t even get a seat at the table. We need campaign finance reform today, because it’s impacting us right now."
U.S. Senate Candidate Forum -- Campaign Finance Reform
Candidate Forum, November 9, 2019
The Democratic Party of Denver hosted a forum for U.S. Senate candidates on Saturday, November 9th. The organizers only invited Democratic candidates to the forum.
Seven candidates participated in the forum: Diana Bray, Michelle Warren, Trish Zornio, John Hickenlooper, Lorena Garcia, Andrew Romanoff, and Stephanie Rose Spaulding.
Other candidates who have filed with the FED include Corey Gardner (R, incumbent), V?ronique Marie Bellamy (S), Joshua Rodriguez (U), and Gary Swing (U).
For our reporting on the source of campaign contributions for all U.S. Senate candidates, please click here.
Candidates each had 60 seconds to answer CleanSlateNow Action's question on campaign finance reform. We received permission from six of the seven participating candidates to share their answers. The seventh was unavailable to confirm her willingness to share her answer, and we hope to add her answer when she is available to respond.
Our question dealt with what self-imposed limits the candidates put on contributions to their campaigns (i.e., accept or turn down contributions from Political Action Committees, lobbyists, Oil and Gas, Small Donor Committees, Unions, Corporations, etc.) and if they would support H.R.1, a proposed campaign finance reform along the lines of Denver's Democracy For The People Act that was passed by the House in January but has been kept from a vote in the Senate ever since.
In addition to addressing voting rights, security, and ethics enforcement, H.R.1 does the following:
- shines a light on dark money,
- empowers everyday Americans with publicly financed multiple matches of small-dollar donations to candidates who turn down special interest money,
- strengthens oversight,
- and pushes back against the Citizens United Supreme Court decision by affirming Congress's authority to regulate money in politics.
The moderator's abbreviated version of our question asked the following: Do you believe that we should set a limit, say for oil and gas lobbyists? Do you support H.R.1 that was recently passed in the House? (Answers below are in the order in which they answered the questions at the forum.)
Michelle Warren
"I have really thought about this issue, because as a person of faith I have been taught from an early age that the root of all kinds of evil stems back to money and that we need to really follow the money. Money has infested our legislative process like a cancer, and it needs to be cut out. It’s not okay if I just say, 'Hey, down with Citizens’ United and up with the For the Peoples Act,' although I am very supportive of the For the Peoples Act and the different elements of that piece of legislation. But I think that that word cancer should wake us up to show the seriousness. What has happened in our campaign financing, I’ve mentioned it in our lobbying, is that we can’t get justice, we can’t get our voice through, because money and greed and power are oppressing it.
Andrew Romanoff
"Yes, I support H.R.1 and other campaign finance reform efforts like those I’ve been fighting for as a legislator and as a member of the board of Colorado Common Cause years ago. I know we spent a lot of time this morning beating up on Cory Gardner and Donald Trump, and don’t get me wrong – it’s fun, it’s cathartic. But our own party bears responsibility here, too. We’re not perfect. The Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, which has recruited and endorsed a candidate in this race – not on this stage, but in this race – relies on the contributions it gets from the fossil fuel industry and the insurance industry and the drug companies. So we should not be surprised when there is too little leadership from Democrats in the U.S. Senate on this front. I wish I could tell you that our Party were perfect. It’s not. We’re not a perfect people. But we’re never going to get the change we need if we allow our own team to continue to be bankrolled by the very same corporate interests that are corrupting our democracy and blocking reform."
Angela Williams
"Amen, Andrew. I’m on the same page about this. And I support H.R.1, and we need campaign finance reform. And right here in this state we have seen the inequities occur with the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee putting their finger on the scale in this race. We already have economic inequity right here with all these candidates by them doing that. What I’m going to say to you is listen to the candidates, support the candidate that represents your values, give to those candidates, and let’s fight back against the inequities that our own party is creating within this race. You’re smarter than that. Okay? You are smarter than that. You are educated. We do not need anyone coming in telling us who should be our next U.S. senator."
Diana Bray
"I think it’s important to look at who is not here. The elephant in the room. I support H.R.1. I support campaign finance reform, of course. It is absolutely unconscionable that industry basically is owning our elections. We have to absolutely defeat that. I’m also, though, an advocate for ranked choice voting, okay? I’ve talked to people in this room about that. I think that’s our pathway. If we had ranked choice voting right now, DSCC would be completely out of the picture with regard to this race. And I encourage you to Google it if you’re not familiar with it. You can go and Google it and find two minutes on the explanation of ranked choice voting. I think that we have to stand up to our own Party. And it’s not going to be just us that have to do that. You have to do it. You have to be bold and you have to advocate and support the people who are in line with your values, not people from another city trying to put their thumb on the lever of politics."
Stephanie Rose Spaulding
"Yes, yes, and yes. Corporations are not people. Money is not speech. I support campaign finance reform, publicly funded options, but I also think we have to have deeper conversations about how the structure and the system of campaigning itself is deeper and deeply rooted in our culture. Open Secrets and The Center for American Women in Politics did a study. African American women are the least funded, because they are the least trusted candidates across America, for any race. And it begins long before you declare wanting to run for office. It begins with alumni networks – I didn’t go to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, or anything like that. I went to an Historically Black College because it was the space that was available to me. So if we’re going to do this, we have to do this systemically and intersectionaly. Thank you."
Lorena Garcia
"Okay, it’s been awhile since we’ve said my name. Ready? One, two, three: Lorena Garcia. Okay. Yeah, H.R.1, 100% behind it. Does it go far enough for me? No, it doesn’t. What I love about H.R.1 is that it gets us on the path to public funded campaigns. It starts with matching every single donation that is received that is under $200. Number two, it’s awesome that it addresses conflicts of interest, but it doesn’t address conflicts of interest for candidates. How in the world would a conflict of interest benefit any of you from deciding who to support if we don’t have to be public about our conflicts of interest while we’re running for office? So we need to change that as well. We need to overturn Citizens United. Super glad that we’ve seen an amendment produced in the House. The other thing, we’ve already heard about the inequalities, the inequity. We’ve heard about big money in our elections. What I can tell you is that I’m proud to announce that I’m the least funded candidate in this race. No secret there. So I need your help. Donate. LorenaforSenate.com."
